More systemic risk?

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , on July 5, 2009 by nakedstranger

Wow, that “systemic risk” phrase has really become popular in the Obama kingdom!

Note the following section from the “Cap and Trade” bill recently passed by the House of Representatives.

“SEC. 360. PRESIDENTIAL REVIEW OF REGULATIONS.
Not later than 24 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the President shall review the offset regulations and derivatives regulations promulgated pursuant to the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009.

The President shall determine whether such regulations adequately protect the United States financial system from systemic risk.”

Whatever happened to the King of England? We have a new king now!

amazing picture of Obama’s inauguration address

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on January 26, 2009 by nakedstranger

David Bergman created an amazing picture of President Obama’s inaugural address. The picture itself is almost 2 gigabytes in size and was created with special software. You can read about how the picture was created on Mr. Bergman’s web site. It’s well worth the visit.

Obama inaugural address

Obama inaugural address

Click on the picture for a full view. It may take a few seconds to load. Remember, it’s almost 2 gigabytes in size.

When it’s loaded in your browser, take a few minutes to use the control to zoom in and pan different areas of the picture. The detail is quite remarkable.

Obama girl denies 54DD

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , on January 19, 2009 by nakedstranger

Just like the campaign rhetoric, Amber Lee Ettinger seems to show a lot more than there really is.

In this video, a man of the cloth, confesses how little he really knows about brassieres and cup sizes. Apparently, the Obama girl has “set him straight” so much that confusion settled in.

The only real question is whether or not the “Obama Girl” can realize her true ambition without instruction from Monica Lewinsky. She does seem quite capable on her own.

If she can use her charms to parlay her way into the perfect Whitehouse position, the Obama-Clinton connection will be complete. History might tell us how much Michelle Obama likes that transition.

Obama – inauguration or coronation?

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , on January 19, 2009 by nakedstranger

I’ve been so enraptured with the idea of having a “magic Negro” in the Whitehouse, that I simply haven’t been able to post anything on this blog for awhile.

Simply knowing that Queen Pelosi and Prince Reed will soon be granted their every wish and Barney Frank’s behind not far (Whoops, I mean not far behind!) has produced a state of ecstacy that shields every American from rationality.

Who could ask for more expensive pomp and circumstance than has been provided by the crew that promises change? Who could imagine that the new President would require a three-state ride in a vintage train to get to his office across the street from the Blair House? Who could imagine that a runway at Dulles Airport would have to be cordoned off for the private use only of inaugural visitors? Did anyone dream that the bridges crossing from Virginia to DC would be closed on inauguration day? Has anyone figured out how this extravaganza will help reduce the Federal deficit?

I certainly wouldn’t deny Savior Obama a celebration. From what I know of history, every President has had an inaugural party. Especially this year, the country should (if nothing else) celebrate the end of the Cheney/Bush era. Note: I specified “Cheney/Bush” because it’s so hard to tell which one was actually practicing the position of President.

I’m told this is an historic event and therefore we should spend many millions of dollars beyond a simple inauguration to commemorate the occasion. I suppose it could be considered historic to elect the nation’s first mulatto president born (not sure where) to a US citizen mother and a non-citizen father.

What concerns me is that the man promised change, but has spent most of his time since the electoral college confirmed his election telling the American citizens that he probably won’t be able to change much. Indeed, the only change he’s made so far is who is holding the office.

Well, wait a minute. He has made some change. He did get the taxpayers to fund a government website using his mantra, “change”, in violation of the regulations. Inheriting the largest deficit in US history, he gets to partake in one of the most expensive inaugural parties ever imagined.

(I’m not sure the second coming of Jesus would pry that much from the government treasury. In fact, I’m sure the atheists would sue both the government and Jesus Christ to prevent the expense.)

His potential cabinet isn’t change, it’s old-school government politicians and bureaucrats. Some were even good at their jobs during that era. I do hope they can help Mr. Obama overcome his inexperience and his communist ideology.

Bush promised little and delivered as much or less. Obama promised much and shows signs of delivering much less. The two men share one important weakness. They are both ideologues. At least Obama appears to be more centrist. But make no mistake: Obama, like Bush, will not tolerate much variance from his philosophy.

That reminds me: for a truly historic event wait until Pelosi bows and curtseys for Obama. How much money will that cost the taxpayers?

Until the Pelosi bow, let the good times roll! Oh, and don’t forget: almost 60 million Americans were convinced that the emperor had no clothes.

Barney Frank says back door okay

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , on November 19, 2008 by nakedstranger

Barney Frank freely admits to being a back-door man,
but when it comes to your money going out the back door,
he’s tight-lipped. That sucking sound you hear is the
money rushing out of the Treasury!

Barney says everything is just fine.

At the rate money is disappearing, by the time
Messiah Obama takes control, there will be no money
available. Maybe Pelosi has the answer: give all the
money to the automakers and all will be well in America.

Rules don’t apply to Obama

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , on November 15, 2008 by nakedstranger

Change? What change?

It looks like Obama and his ilk will be no better than previous criminals who have held public office in Washington. And, he’s not even in office yet.

With impunity, he already set up a website “change.gov” that violates the rules of the “.gov” domain.

Just for your own amusement, here are the rules stated right on the official gov domain website.

  • No General Domain Names: General terms alone such as “licenses,” “recreation,” and “benefits” are not allowed because they do not represent a specific enough origin and service.
  • No Political or Campaign Information: The Gov domain is for the operation of government, not the political, political party, or campaign environment. No campaigning can be done using Gov Internet domains. The Gov Internet domain websites may not be directly linked to or refer to websites created or operated by a campaign or any campaign entity or committee. No political sites or party names or acronyms can be used.

Maybe these folks can set up a nice government web site for Bill Ayers, too. Contact the GSA when you’re ready to set up that site.

Obama is not the President-elect

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on November 15, 2008 by nakedstranger

To paraphrase McCain, during one of his campaign speeches, “Obama is already measuring the drapes.”

Amen! I know Obama and his sidekick, Joe Biden, is anxious. However, under the American system, Obama will NOT be the “President-elect” until after the electoral college votes. Depending on the mood of the electors, he might not become “President-elect” then. Granted, I think the scenario whereby the electors fail to choose Obama, is highly unlikely at this point.

I just question the pompous declaration of a so-called constituional scholar that it’s okay to drape himself in the mantle of “President-elect” when in fact, it is not yet confirmed. Until the votes are confirmed, it’s more appropriate to use other terms like “possible-President-elect”, “probable-President-elect”, maybe even “de-facto-President-elect.”

Of course, none of this makes any difference since he’s already begun to order Congress to do his bidding. Nice touch. I have to wonder if the man aspires to be Dictator of a Socialist society, or the President of a Democratic Republic.

much ado about nothing

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , on May 15, 2008 by nakedstranger

In this case, the “nothing” refers to the amount of clothing this teenage girl was wearing.

Okay, I’m exaggerating! The girl was wearing something… just not very much of it.

I love this quote from the CNN blog:

Willie
updated Mon May 12, 2008

I bet the answer to the question wouldn’t surprise me but I heard several comments about her mom. Where’s the daddy of this girl? I guarantee you he’s not in the picture! I have four daughters and ain’t no way in hell, they would’ve walk out my house looking like that.

Then there’s this quote from the forum at the Ocala Star-Banner forum:

robertr3
Posted 13 May 2008 11:48
It looks fine to me. Everyone in just so hung up on a little skin showing. I don’t see it as too revealing. She has everything important covered.

Talk about disparate views! Wait! “Viewing” is what the issue is about. ;-)

http://tinyurl.com/4ldplk

ACLU has it right this time

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , on May 9, 2008 by nakedstranger

The ACLU has posted its position regarding the Texas vs. FLDS situation on its website. It’s one of the best descriptions I’ve seen on the principles involved with the case.

Here’s the link: http://www.aclu.org/religion/gen/35123res20080502.html

The saddest thing about this case is that the children have been taken away from their parents without due process. The judge, for the sake of her own convenience, even violated Texas state law by passing judgment without individual hearings.

It was evident that the Judge presumed that every child was abused and that every adult was guilty of that abuse. Using that presumption, she exercised her power to take the children away from everything familiar to them. The children have been forced to go many miles from home to live with strangers who plan to force-feed them with ideas that their parents have wronged them by shielding them from the distractions of a God-less society.

Where is the public outcry?

It’s old, forgotten news now. Who cares what happens to these children?

It’s not a problem anyway. The key phrase, “child abuse”, has been uttered so everyone involved is automatically guilty. Not to worry… big brother is going to take care of everything. Besides, those people dress funny, too. So, even if they didn’t commit any crimes they must be guilty of something.

The precedent

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , on April 22, 2008 by nakedstranger

Larry King asked if there was any precedent for the State’s actions:
The Nazi invasion of Warsaw comes to mind.

And then they were gone